5 thoughts on “When the Taiyuan Police executed the task, 8 carat diamonds were sentenced to sentence. What legal issues are involved?”
Kelli
When the police of Taiyuan, Li, assisted in the arrest task, turned off the law enforcement recorder, and took the opportunity to create chaos, stole 8.37 carat diamonds, emeralds, and famous watches including 8.37 carat diamonds. After the incident of the East Window, Li also refused to explain his criminal behavior, concealed the stolen goods, compiled a lie, and deliberately concealed the truth. The people's court of Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province tried the theft case. Police Li was sentenced to fourteen years and six months in prison for the first instance of theft, and fined 200,000 yuan. I. After the incident of the East Window, after the case, Li also refused to explain his criminal behavior, concealed the stolen goods, fabricated lies, and deliberately concealed the truth. The Xiaodian District Court of Taiyuan City believes that a stolen diamond ring has a identified value of 1.26 million yuan, and the remaining stolen items cannot determine its price. Li's crime of theft is 1.26 million yuan. Knowing the law and committing the law, the crime is plus. As the police handling of the case, Li even saw the money when he enforced the law, and he thought about the valuable property of the parties. He tried to steal huge property. It was the image of a humiliation police team and must be sanctioned by law.
The Ms. Hao's house in Taiyuan, Shanxi came to several police officers to ask her husband to help the case for investigation. After the police left, Ms. Hao's couple found that two emerald pendants, a jadeite ring, a 8.37 carat diamond ring, and a watch disappeared. Police investigations found that the thief was actually a policeman who participated in the arrest mission. He premeditated in advance that when he assisted in the arrest task, he turned off the law enforcement recorder and took the opportunity to create chaos. He stolen the total value of about 7 million in the home. This evidence can prove that the case involved in the case on the day of the incident was at the scene of the crime. The defendant Li entered Room 702 to close his law enforcement recorder in 54 seconds and asked an auxiliary police officer to close the law enforcement recorder to have the motivation to commit crimes. Li, Li entered the victim's master bedroom twice, stepped on, searched in the master bedroom many times, searched, waited for the opportunity to deal with the crime, and tied to contact with the only person in the place of stolen goods to store the location. Li refused to explain his criminal behavior, concealed stolen goods, fabricated lies, and had a criminal intention to illegally possess the property of others in a subjective mentality.
In the process of law enforcement, the stolen other people's property and humiliating the image of the people's police first constituted the crime of theft. After being discovered, they refused to explain. The law of knowing the law is even more crime. It is currently judged by the court for 14 years and 6 months in prison and fined 200,000.
Theft was criminal, because the police stole some diamonds from the host at the time of handling the case. After being discovered, they refused to admit it. As a people's police, they also knew the law and committed the law.
When the police of Taiyuan, Li, assisted in the arrest task, turned off the law enforcement recorder, and took the opportunity to create chaos, stole 8.37 carat diamonds, emeralds, and famous watches including 8.37 carat diamonds. After the incident of the East Window, Li also refused to explain his criminal behavior, concealed the stolen goods, compiled a lie, and deliberately concealed the truth.
The people's court of Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province tried the theft case. Police Li was sentenced to fourteen years and six months in prison for the first instance of theft, and fined 200,000 yuan.
I. After the incident of the East Window, after the case, Li also refused to explain his criminal behavior, concealed the stolen goods, fabricated lies, and deliberately concealed the truth. The Xiaodian District Court of Taiyuan City believes that a stolen diamond ring has a identified value of 1.26 million yuan, and the remaining stolen items cannot determine its price. Li's crime of theft is 1.26 million yuan. Knowing the law and committing the law, the crime is plus. As the police handling of the case, Li even saw the money when he enforced the law, and he thought about the valuable property of the parties. He tried to steal huge property. It was the image of a humiliation police team and must be sanctioned by law.
The Ms. Hao's house in Taiyuan, Shanxi came to several police officers to ask her husband to help the case for investigation. After the police left, Ms. Hao's couple found that two emerald pendants, a jadeite ring, a 8.37 carat diamond ring, and a watch disappeared. Police investigations found that the thief was actually a policeman who participated in the arrest mission. He premeditated in advance that when he assisted in the arrest task, he turned off the law enforcement recorder and took the opportunity to create chaos. He stolen the total value of about 7 million in the home.
This evidence can prove that the case involved in the case on the day of the incident was at the scene of the crime. The defendant Li entered Room 702 to close his law enforcement recorder in 54 seconds and asked an auxiliary police officer to close the law enforcement recorder to have the motivation to commit crimes.
Li, Li entered the victim's master bedroom twice, stepped on, searched in the master bedroom many times, searched, waited for the opportunity to deal with the crime, and tied to contact with the only person in the place of stolen goods to store the location. Li refused to explain his criminal behavior, concealed stolen goods, fabricated lies, and had a criminal intention to illegally possess the property of others in a subjective mentality.
In the process of law enforcement, the stolen other people's property and humiliating the image of the people's police first constituted the crime of theft. After being discovered, they refused to explain. The law of knowing the law is even more crime. It is currently judged by the court for 14 years and 6 months in prison and fined 200,000.
Theft was criminal, because the police stole some diamonds from the host at the time of handling the case. After being discovered, they refused to admit it. As a people's police, they also knew the law and committed the law.
The incident was crime of theft. The court believed that the police stole the property of others for the purpose of illegal possession.
This behavior is a theft, and hidden stolen goods, fabricating lies, is a serious illegal act, sentenced to 14 years and 6 months.